BW can Unscrew UT3.
(I'm not requesting BW for UT3[but that would make the game better, but...nevermind])
| RuneStorm http://www.runestorm.com/forums/ |
|
| Which would be better? http://www.runestorm.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=55825 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Deathstorm [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
They kind of skrewed UT3 up, consoleizing it. No real setting menu is a big gripe, so I was thinking quake 4 could use some love. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
You are right that Quake 4 lacks love from gamers, but that is the main reason why a Q4 BW port is not a smart move. It sucks, but this is simply how thing are. |
|
| Author: | Glosmostinex [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
BW can Unscrew UT3.
(I'm not requesting BW for UT3[but that would make the game better, but...nevermind]) |
|
| Author: | Deathstorm [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
Glosmostinex wrote: BW can Unscrew UT3.
(I'm not requesting BW for UT3[but that would make the game better, but...nevermind]) A lot better, they even skrewed it up more dumbing down the menu system. I am not sure if I am use to the bloody hell mut or UT3 is just not bloody. I have it set on bloody hell & still, none to be seen. I needed my ID to get the game to!!! |
|
| Author: | akstylish [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
STOP WHINING!!! I'M SO SICK OF UI COMPLAINTS! |
|
| Author: | Glosmostinex [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
akstylish wrote: STOP WHINING!!! I'M SO SICK OF UI COMPLAINTS!
But I think that the UT3 UI is.... 
|
|
| Author: | James [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
akstylish wrote: STOP WHINING!!! I'M SO SICK OF UI COMPLAINTS!
Take some Midol or get a new tampon. thanks 
|
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
akstylish wrote: STOP WHINING!!! I'M SO SICK OF UI COMPLAINTS!
UT3's UI is a piece of shit. If you are sick of reading that fact, then don't read it again. |
|
| Author: | akstylish [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
I don't want to, but many threads not related to UI end up being full of complaints about it. 
|
|
| Author: | James [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
Criticism and complaints are two different things, you my friend are ranting. |
|
| Author: | akstylish [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
How is it that I'm ranting? And whining about UI won't do a thing but encourage flaming each other. You know that. I'm gonna stop here. I don't wanna see another thread getting locked. |
|
| Author: | James [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
"STOP WHINING!!! I'M SO SICK OF UI COMPLAINTS!" that is ranting, ranting will get you flamed. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
James, he said he was gonna stop, no need to add fuel to the fire. Time to go back to the original subject, which was about BW for Quake 4. |
|
| Author: | James [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
ok ok
BW for Quake4 sounds pretty awesome, still gotta pick that game up for me mac...... i doubt the price has dropped yet though(for the mac version that is). |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
I liked the game very much, but as I said above it may not be very wise to make BW for it. The playerbase is small. However, iD Software plan to release iD Tech 4 (Doom 3 engine) under the GPL before too long, maybe just two or three years... |
|
| Author: | James [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
two or three years can be either very short..... or very long. I still want to pick the game up tho, last time i checked it was running for $40(american).......... |
|
| Author: | ShadowBlade [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
BW for Q4.. nice though that would be, it wont happen 
|
|
| Author: | SX [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
Why Q4? If I want to see BW in another game, it has to be UT1. Then again, i can never play it again because my Basement computer's too powerful, and my laptop will smack it upside the head by Windows "Freaking" Vista.
Edit- Well i'll be damned. It does work in my downstairs computer. 
|
|
| Author: | Sargeant Smash [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
I liked quake 4, very good game. Dont know if i would like to see BW put in Q4 because the small player base but in Doom3 i think it would be better because its the same engine and as a much larger player base. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
Sargeant Smash wrote: because its the same engine
If it were the same engine, the mod would work with both Doom 3 and Quake 4. That ain't the case, sadly, even though Q4's engine is just a modified version of iD Tech 4. But I think it would be relatively easy to release two versions of the same mod for both games. When the initial work is done, like making the new content, the assets could easily be implemented into both games without too much coding work. |
|
| Author: | yoderboy58 [ Tue May 06, 2008 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
i want to try ut3 and quake 4 |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Tue May 06, 2008 5:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Which would be better? |
Well, then buy & play them. And even if your computer isn't powerful enough, the games can simply wait on your desk until you upgrade the computer. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|