| RuneStorm http://www.runestorm.com/forums/ |
|
| im back, with a newer computer http://www.runestorm.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=73859 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | thetrunkmonkey [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
Yes i have been inactive for some time on these forums and i apologize. And i did get a much better computer, sadly not good enough to run ut3 at decent frame rates. i also found my copy of ut04 with the cd key so yay. here are my computer system specs Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+, MMX, 3DNow, ~1.8GHz Memory: 768MB RAM Video Card: RADEON 9000 SERIES Sound Card: NVIDIA(R) nForce(TM) Audio Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 3 (2600.xpsp_sp3_gdr.090206-1234) For some reason one of my ram slots are not reading all of the ram i have in one stick, i just put in a ram stick that had 500 mb and it isnt even reading half of it so i should of had more ram. Tho my computer runs hl2 and css like a charm |
|
| Author: | Tyster [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
thetrunkmonkey wrote: Yes i have been inactive for some time on these forums and i apologize.
No need to apologize for being gone -- teee heee heeeeeee... that sounded funnier in my head. Good to have you back. You might even be able to handle heavier games like UT3 on higher settings with that system. The CPU is quite weak for even your average computer today and the RAM is not exactly impressive, but it is my understanding that the GPU does most of the heavy lifting, especially with a nVidia 9XX0. I'd be curious to hear how your computer handles heavy games if you ever get any installed. |
|
| Author: | thetrunkmonkey [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
yea i do need a major upgrade for mt ram and cpu but the video card is ok. But i do have a nvidia bfg card sitting on my desk ready to be installed but we have had major issues getting it to work so im not even sure if the card is still good |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
Tyster wrote: You might even be able to handle heavier games like UT3 on higher settings with that system. The CPU is quite weak for even your average computer today and the RAM is not exactly impressive, but it is my understanding that the GPU does most of the heavy lifting, especially with a nVidia 9XX0.
The Radeon 9000 series were benchmarked with RtCW over 6 years ago, I don't think it can run UT3 at higher settings. But even if he had a powerful card like a Geforce 9xx0, it would be heavily bottlenecked by the processor. Oh, and it depends entirely on the engine which hardware has the biggest role when running a game. UE2.5 for example relies more on CPU than the typical game of the GPU era, but I don't know about UE3.0. @trunkmonkey: It may be that your system is dual channel enabled. If that is the case, putting two RAM modules with different specs into a matching bank is a bad idea. Not only will the mobo downclock the faster module to the speed of the slowest one, but there is a good chance the memory controller doesn't like the differing capacity either and does something to correct it. This is both bad for performance and stability. If your mobo is dual channel enabled, make sure the two RAM sticks are not in the same bank (they are usually color-coded, so just put the modules into differently colored slots). |
|
| Author: | Tyster [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
Oops, My bad. I somehow thought I saw nVidia, even though RADEON was in all caps. Cancel what I said about the video handling UT3. I recall my old Radeon 9200 Sapphire (I didn't know much back in the day) could handle UT2004 pretty well, BW well enough on lower settings, but nothing heavier than HL2. |
|
| Author: | thetrunkmonkey [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
Bjossi wrote: Tyster wrote: You might even be able to handle heavier games like UT3 on higher settings with that system. The CPU is quite weak for even your average computer today and the RAM is not exactly impressive, but it is my understanding that the GPU does most of the heavy lifting, especially with a nVidia 9XX0. The Radeon 9000 series were benchmarked with RtCW over 6 years ago, I don't think it can run UT3 at higher settings. But even if he had a powerful card like a Geforce 9xx0, it would be heavily bottlenecked by the processor. Oh, and it depends entirely on the engine which hardware has the biggest role when running a game. UE2.5 for example relies more on CPU than the typical game of the GPU era, but I don't know about UE3.0. @trunkmonkey: It may be that your system is dual channel enabled. If that is the case, putting two RAM modules with different specs into a matching bank is a bad idea. Not only will the mobo downclock the faster module to the speed of the slowest one, but there is a good chance the memory controller doesn't like the differing capacity either and does something to correct it. This is both bad for performance and stability. If your mobo is dual channel enabled, make sure the two RAM sticks are not in the same bank (they are usually color-coded, so just put the modules into differently colored slots). thx bjossi il give that a try hopefully that will boost my ram also like i said i have a good nvidia bfg card waiting, hoping it works this time. |
|
| Author: | thetrunkmonkey [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
it worked i put two ram sticks with 512 mb each and i got a gig of ram now. Nothing impressive but hey get whatever you can take. thank you bjossi |
|
| Author: | Captain Xavious [ Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
I'm glad to hear you got an upgrade!
Have a lot of fun with it yet?
|
|
| Author: | Echo 419 [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
I know that system can run Rise of Nations which is a fun game. Should'nt have to much trouble with Ut04 but I dont remember how well my old 1.8 GHz athlon handled it. Bon Voyage and best of luck with your future gaming endeavours
|
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
UT2 is light on resources, even for a 2004 game. But trunkmonkey is way behind the times still, his upgrade is vastly inferior to the one I made over 3 years ago. |
|
| Author: | Echo 419 [ Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | im back, with a newer computer |
Same here, 3 years ago I had a Pentium 4 3.0 GHz that I thought was the shiz! Even though at that time everyone was upgrading to dual cores and such. By todays standards as I speak Im still behind the times just trying to play a never ending catch up game. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|