hmmm
sounds interesting.. heavy calibre rifle (anti-tank) kinda thing.. i like 
| RuneStorm http://www.runestorm.com/forums/ |
|
| Howitzer ? http://www.runestorm.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=10395 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Gordon Freeman [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
First of al its a great mod I have a weapon in mind that resembles a howitzer cannon. The primary fire would shoot a shell like the golliath tank (or smaller calliber ). However the secondary fire would shout out a shell that explodes in mid air and releases smaller bombs and/or flak (or napalm) tearing through your enemy or wathever crosses its path. An option in the mod menu could be timing the secondary fire shell ( when it would explode in mid air) So what do uou think about this Weapon? |
|
| Author: | ShadowBlade [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
hmmm sounds interesting.. heavy calibre rifle (anti-tank) kinda thing.. i like
|
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
a Howitzer would be impossible to carry, and the recoil alone would kill you. But a heavy calibre rifle sounds better than a stupid mobile cannon. |
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
No fraggin handheld howitzers. BW isn't about being reaistic, but it IS about being serious. Goofy stuff like this belongs in U4E. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
I'm sure i even have a mod on UT2k4 that has a Howitzer cause in BW arean i keep seeing Howitzer somewhere in it.
Yeah if you RS guys make a Howitzer, i just might have to hang myself. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Mr.UglyPants wrote: Yeah if you RS guys make a Howitzer, i just might have to hang myself.
Yeah, it'd be a shame to lose you. 
Anyways, this idea doesn't fit BW, plain and simple. But it could if we change a few aspects of the idea.
|
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
What kind of aspects? the Howitzer can never be carried, thats why they have tanks to carry it. |
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Maybe chuck the howitzer and anti-tank rifle ideas and combine them into. . . A 90mm recoilless rifle. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
That would still be F**king huge! |
|
| Author: | Meatboy [ Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
An anti tank rifle would be useful in Ons games Heavy and slow to reload but packing a wallop. Similar to a Karl Gustav. Reocil would be solved buy having it be a Magnetic weapon. Have it fire a Uranium discarding sabot dart, that goes critical when it strikes a soild target causing a tiny Nuke explosion. That would be bad for a vechile. However hitting a soft human target would cause meduim damage because it would pass right on through. Being next to a wall when the dart goes critical on it would be bad however. 
|
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Mr.UglyPants wrote: What kind of aspects? the Howitzer can never be carried, thats why they have tanks to carry it.
You seem to have forgot about the semi-realistic aspect. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
still how in gods name is anyone gonna be able to carry a 90mm rifle? You just can't! |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Mr.UglyPants wrote: still how in gods name is anyone gonna be able to carry a 90mm rifle? You just can't! ... Bjossi wrote: You seem to have forgot about the semi-realistic aspect.
|
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
A**hole. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Mr.UglyPants wrote: A**hole.
Thanks for the compliment.
|
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
I'm not talking about anything TOO unrealistic. I said a 90mm recoilless rifle. Go read this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recoilless_rifle It's big, it's cool, it's not used in a dozen other mods, and it would be fragging goodness. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Oh... so its like a German panzerfaust from WWII, well if you had that link to it in the first place, i wouldn't be looking like an idiot right now 
Yeah that would be cool, but isn't it like another G5 almost but no recoil? And so far i've seen at least 3 or 4 (including this new one) G5 like missle launchers that RS could make for BW. |
|
| Author: | Meatboy [ Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Nope not like a G5 since recioless rifles can only be shot right at a target. They have no guidance to speak of other than a well placed aim. Add to that the shells thrust is all in the tube not from an attached motor. SO damage to a vechile or solid object would be heavy but you would have to lead well to be spot on to hit the target. |
|
| Author: | ShadowBlade [ Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
ok.. a big calibre rifle that has to be MOUNTED might work better.. thats more or less what i thought.. |
|
| Author: | Deuxhero [ Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
A howezer sounds better as a vehicle |
|
| Author: | Abbadon [ Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Agreed. But I still like the idea of a recoilless rifle bridging the gap between an anti-vehicle rocket and an anti-tank rifle. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
anti-vehicle and anti-tank rocket is almost the same damn thing, they both blow the crap out of heavily armed things. |
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Yeah, but a recoilless rifle would neither be a G5 clone because the shot would be MUCH faster and unguided, and it wouldn't be a souped up sniper rifle because it would be less accurate and you could only carry a couple rounds. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
yeah but a regular non tracking G5 shot is also unguided. |
|
| Author: | Meatboy [ Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Mr.UglyPants wrote: yeah but a regular non tracking G5 shot is also unguided.
True but a G5 round is slow I can dodge em in most vechiles if I see em fired. A rifle round would be fast and impossible to dodge. Like the Idea of a small ammo load out that a nd a slow reload time to balance out the hurt it could deliver. |
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Agreed. The recoilless rifle would be nearly impossible to dodge, would not be highly explosive, so as to not take the G5's job as an anti-personell launcher, and you could only carry a very few rounds, and very slow reload time between rounds. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
It is possible to dodge a bullet, but you will have to have 2x quicker response time than the average person, like 0.08 seconds or something. Supersonic bullets are impossible to dodge unless you are decently far away, and afaik, most bullets are supersonic when fired. |
|
| Author: | Gordon Freeman [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Maybe it could be mounted on top of a hellbender ? Instead of that (according to me) lame rear turret. Meaning the 90 mm rifle and perhaps make it more or less like anti aircraft guns from WW 2 Thinking of it that howitzer would be a good replacement for the ion cannon you just call in a bombardment off some sort ( like the target painter) primary fire a normal bombardment of howitzer shells and secundary fire who knows what kind of bombardment |
|
| Author: | datsylel [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Bjossi wrote: It is possible to dodge a bullet, but you will have to have 2x quicker response time than the average person, like 0.08 seconds or something. Supersonic bullets are impossible to dodge unless you are decently far away, and afaik, most bullets are supersonic when fired. Then you wouldn't be able to dodge it, because you'd be dead before you heard the shot fired (supersonic anyone?). Ruex wrote: Maybe it could be mounted on top of a hellbender ? Instead of that (according to me) lame rear turret. Meaning the 90 mm rifle and perhaps make it more or less like anti aircraft guns from WW 2
Thinking of it that howitzer would be a good replacement for the ion cannon you just call in a bombardment off some sort ( like the target painter) primary fire a normal bombardment of howitzer shells and secundary fire who knows what kind of bombardment There won't be any hellbenders. There will be all new vehicles. |
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Howitzer ? |
Also, the Artillery Strike was on the last weapon poll posted. I still think a high-caliber recoilless rifle is a much better idea than having a high-powered snti-tank rifle that will basically just be a souped up sniper rifle. And probably better than having ANOTHER rocket launcher for anti-vehicle purposes. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|