| RuneStorm http://www.runestorm.com/forums/ |
|
| Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? http://www.runestorm.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=24850 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Jerry [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Imagine it... ...the flames... ...the screaming... ...the fact I am disturbed  ...
Just reckoned it may be cool, although it would probably make the FPS go down badly. Saying this, it probably exists anyway in some mutator online or something But I don't think air-strikes should be abandoned in BW, whether napalm or not AND.. Flashbangs anyone? causing blindness and deafness for a while? |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
air strikes would be cool once RS implements vehicles. And the flashbang has already been asked for by many members. |
|
| Author: | Jerry [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
gdgd, thought it might have been |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Mr.UglyPants wrote: air strikes would be cool once RS implements vehicles.
They would be just as cool with the original vehicles or the Xyx pack. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Xyx pack is never going be released. Or is it out? Yeah an airstrike either way would be pretty cool. |
|
| Author: | Dark_Watcher [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Xyx is in a WID loop |
|
| Author: | Captain Xavious [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
There was just a news update the other day, and there already is some stuff released. |
|
| Author: | Dark_Watcher [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
I know that, i was refering to the good stuff that has yet to come out. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
yeah, but even that stuff isn't truly released, because Xyx doesn't even attempet to add good textures over the UV, he just makes some and just hopes it looks okay. |
|
| Author: | Dark_Watcher [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
He has better skins but he is wating to bring it all out together |
|
| Author: | Doc Shock [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Mr.UglyPants wrote: Xyx doesn't even attempet to add good textures over the UV, he just makes some and just hopes it looks okay.
Whoa, guys, hold it a bit. Xyx is only a coder (a very good one, in fact). He can't create models or textures. The models are provided by T-Shinzon (that's why their pack is named XS vehicles: Xyx-Shinzon), but he can't texture as well. All texture artists who promised to help them out by skinning one or more vehicles screwed them over or let them down. So, until they'll find a reliable and talented skinner, all vehicles will have placeholder skins. And as far as the release goes: It is planned that the UT2k4 version of the pack won't be anything more than a beta, the final pack is planned for UT2007 so you guys are partially right: As far as UT2k4 is concerned, the final version will indeed never come out. You'll have to get the next UT installment for that. Edit: Of course there will be more beta releases before UT2007 comes out, so there's still a lot of nice stuff to come to experiment with. But only against bots, since the other reason why it is a beta (besides the lack of skins) is the nonexistent net support. Of course it would be a dream come true if Ballistic weapons would fuse with XS, but I know that's extremely unlikely. Too bad, though, because Xyx even mentioned once that he'd love to replace the UT weapons with more tactical ones for XS, but won't find the time to do so. @topic: Napalm might be cool as a replacement for the target painter. The painter could be replaced with goggles, the bomber that is called in by the signal can be replaced with some kind of Jet and it could release a napalm carpet instead of the usual line of bombs... |
|
| Author: | Dark_Watcher [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
That’s too bad I was hoping to get the XS pack before UT2007, oh well guess I’ll have to weight On Topic: we have gone over this many times it’s about time for someone to get all the suggestions together and make an all in one super weapon thread. |
|
| Author: | ShadowBlade [ Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
air strikes.. artillery strikes.. i want, but not sure when 
flashbangs.. one of the most discussed, just like the AK.. want a Flash, but not sure when either.. perhaps soon 
|
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
If you guys don't add a Flashbang, we'll be on the edge of a civil war., heh. |
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Flash bangs would be a great addition to BW. Napalm strikes. . .Maybe. I'm kinda partial to regular explosive artillery strikes. On the topic of napalm, though. . .I regret to inform you that ChaosUT2 has somewhat better flame effects than BW right now.
This does not make me happy. Blasted Chaoticdreams, thinking that can outdo RS and get away with it. I say we lynch them. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
I have to agree, when I fired the MUG first time my jaw dropped on the floor. |
|
| Author: | Jerry [ Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
but does chaosUT2 cause horrendous FPS? |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
If you got an ancient PC, then yes. |
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
If you can play UT2k4 with good frames, CUT2 won't do a thing, might make load times well longer. |
|
| Author: | Jerry [ Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
1Gb Ram GeForce FX5500 (256mb) but It runs slowly on certain maps anyway, think it may be a memory problem, I'm gonna dowload spysweeper |
|
| Author: | Dark_Watcher [ Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Bjossi wrote: If you guys don't add a Flashbang, we'll be on the edge of a civil war., heh.
is that even possible on the internet?.... um well I’m a loyalist, for all the good it will do anyone, as I have no power. |
|
| Author: | Doc Shock [ Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Carsomyr wrote: On the topic of napalm, though. . .I regret to inform you that ChaosUT2 has somewhat better flame effects than BW right now. Well, at the moment, yes. I'm curious how the BW2.0 Flamethrower effects will look like. If it looks good, it should be quite easy to use it for a Napalm airstrike as well. It's good that there are other mods out there that do this or that better, that way you get inspired to aim higher, so to speak. When Shadow and DC finally find the time to create superweapons it will be the same, I hope they'll be able to deliver something as good as the second-to-none nuke effect from Unreal4Ever (or maybe even surpass it).
|
|
| Author: | Mr.UglyPants [ Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
yeah, but the CUT2 flames lag any PC that plays UT2k4 on low to medium setting, while BW's are still really good, with no lag at all. Though i bet, RS could make amazing flames with no lag. |
|
| Author: | Carsomyr [ Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Napalm Strike? Flashbangs? |
Probably. Though, to Doc. Shock, I think I might have to say that the Siege2k4 nuke looks just a tad better than the U4E one. OR maybe I've got that backwards. I think the immense red-glow from the U4E one annoyed me. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|