| RuneStorm https://www.runestorm.com/forums/ |
|
| A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? https://www.runestorm.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=286 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Fri Jan 27, 2006 11:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Like the one made for Halo, which allows the ability to sneak around corners without being seen. The crosshair shows right over your head and the shots shoot directly into it, not like that frustrating Arial View mod where the crosshair's Z axis is always changing all over the place, no. That Arial View is just... bleh. Good idea, poorly executed.  inch:
... Just a thought. It'd make for some cool melee battles. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
I don´t think there is another 3rd person mutator apart from Aerial View. You´d just have to request it on a very alive UT200x forum like Atari´s UT2003/4 forums. Or you could ask RuneStorm nicely.  Post edited by: Bjossi, at: 2006/01/28 14:25 |
|
| Author: | James [ Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
i am a FPS player all the way. there are only a few good 3rd person games. there's this one Half Life mod called specialist. one of the best mods i have seen. there is one 3rd person martial arts TC fot ut2004 called muralis. it didn't fit my style though. i dont know of any mutators though.............. |
|
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Well personally I like both first and third person shooters.. like say, when playing Halo online with the 3rd person modification lets you sneak around corners without being seen and it lets you judge when the right time to pop out and blow the crap out of your enemy is. I never play without it, unless I'm in a tight spot like the Flood level where I'm surrounded and it wouldn't help anyway. |
|
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Bjossi wrote: Quote: I don´t think there is another 3rd person mutator apart from Aerial View. You´d just have to request it on a very alive UT200x forum like Atari´s UT2003/4 forums.
Or you could ask RuneStorm nicely. I just may. I LOVE YOU RUUUNESTOOOORM ;O |
|
| Author: | James [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
KamunouHyena wrote: Quote: I just may. I LOVE YOU RUUUNESTOOOORM ;O thats kinda REALLY creepy............. Post edited by: James, at: 2006/01/29 04:14 |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 2:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
That isn´t creepy, the word 'love' has a double meaning. 
|
|
| Author: | James [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Gee, i didn't know that. thanks for taking the time to look it up in a dictionary for me 
|
|
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
No, nonono the dictionary sucks. Wikipidia, b!t(h3s! |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
I just used the knowledge I already have. Love means to like someone as a friend, having fun doing something together like playing computer games. I don´t really have to explain the other meaning, you made it quite clear that you know it James.
|
|
| Author: | James [ Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
DUDE, your smart! whats your IQ? |
|
| Author: | Erika [ Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
The online 3PS Gunz is a good example of an third person shooter.
|
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
James wrote: Quote: DUDE, your smart!
whats your IQ? I have no idea, I´ve never taken an IQ test. |
|
| Author: | James [ Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
same with me......... |
|
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
I've played that game, and I suck at it BAD. Lmao. There's some serious problems with lagginess, especially since my ass on dial up. But yeah. That and Max Payne are both very good examples of 3rd person shooters. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Max Payne was pretty good actually. My opinion is from watching my brother play it, of course I didn´t play it myself.
|
|
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Ehhh the graphics weren't top-notch, and there was a bit of an issue with the mouse response time, but it was freaking ownage nonetheless. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Games look good at their "golden year", Quake was the best looking game in existance in 1996, just like Max Payne looked fantastic in 2001. But now...source ports for Quake and possible future source ports for games like Max Payne or Red Faction. I think computer graphics advance faster than anything else. If for example astrology would, then we(humans) would be mining in the Betelgause star system 600 lightyears away.
|
|
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Bjossi wrote: Quote: Games look good at their "golden year", Quake was the best looking game in existance in 1996, just like Max Payne looked fantastic in 2001.
But now...source ports for Quake and possible future source ports for games like Max Payne or Red Faction. I think computer graphics advance faster than anything else. If for example astrology would, then we(humans) would be mining in the Betelgause star system 600 lightyears away. Meeeh, so true. I actually hate to say it but I'd rather work at Nasa than Epic. But that's only because I suck ass at scripting. |
|
| Author: | Tolil [ Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Your right. Just think about Diablo II. Not too old. Look great back then. Now it sucks eggs! |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
KamunouHyena wrote: Quote: Meeeh, so true. I actually hate to say it but I'd rather work at Nasa than Epic. But that's only because I suck ass at scripting.
Same here, it would be kind of fun to be inside an actual starship travelling insanely fast. I´ve read news that Nasa are speculating theories of how to travel in another dimension where the speed of light is much faster than 200k miles per second. |
|
| Author: | KamunouHyena [ Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Bjossi wrote: Quote: KamunouHyena wrote:
Quote: Meeeh, so true. I actually hate to say it but I'd rather work at Nasa than Epic. But that's only because I suck ass at scripting. Oh my GOD. That would be so awesome. Imagine the possibilities.. we'd be able to reach new planets and everything.. Which brings me to this. http://www.shatters.net/celestia/ This program here is freaking amazing.. it shows the universe in real time and every start known to man. You can click on any random star and it'll take you there, and give you specs on it. There's all sorts of stuff here that just blew me away the first time I saw it.. |
|
| Author: | Bjossi [ Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | A decent 3rd person shooting mutator, maybe? |
Sounds kickass, I´m downloading it right at this very moment. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|