Bjossi, check this out....

James · **Posted:** Sun May 14, 2006 8:30 pm

you still thinking about wether or not you are gonna download Killing Floor 2.0 when it comes out?

well....... check this out.

http://news.moddb.com/16927/kf-20-updat ... 120#181120

THOSE GRAPHICS PWN SO BADDDD.

Mr.UglyPants · **Posted:** Sun May 14, 2006 8:49 pm

Those poor poor Zombies, they never knew what hit em!

Bjossi · **Posted:** Sun May 14, 2006 8:58 pm

I'm not really impressed by the graphics, the UE2.5 is pretty outdated anyways.
And I'm not going to download it, way too big. :S

Mr.UglyPants · **Posted:** Sun May 14, 2006 9:48 pm

yeah i hate the graphics from it look at the arms of player they're squared!

James · **Posted:** Sun May 14, 2006 11:33 pm

Bjossi wrote:

Quote:

I'm not really impressed by the graphics, the UE2.5 is pretty outdated anyways.
And I'm not going to download it, way too big. :S

Mr.UglyPants wrote:[/b]

Quote:

yeah i hate the graphics from it look at the arms of player they're squared!

what vision do you have? the hands couldnt look smoother, this doesnt look any thing like the UE2.5.

i thought this was DOOM3 at first, how blind are you people???????

Mr.UglyPants · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 12:04 am

still not amazing plus you can't have crosshairs which sucks!

James · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 1:19 am

Mr.UglyPants wrote:

Quote:

still not amazing plus you can't have crosshairs which sucks!

hmm......

i didn't know cross hairs decided if a game sucks or not. you can't say those graphics are bad (well you can but thats just asinine). whys it seem that any mod EXCEPT BW sucks (to you guys)???

i am beginning to think you people have no other interest. maybe you dont like zombies but dont talk unless you can actually back you opinions up. sure BW rocks but i want something more than just guns and cool explosions..........

btw, i dont see any negative comments there so............

Post edited by: James, at: 2006/05/15 02:21

Bjossi · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 1:21 am

James, I'm playing Doom 3 at Ultra 1024 x 768 with 16xAF and 8xAA, I get average 60 FPS which is the max FPS of the game, so don't tell me what good graphics are.

Maybe you think the screenshots look great because you aren't spoiled like me. After I got my new computer, it will be hard to impress me with graphics, especially outdated graphics like UE2.5 delivers.

Spiced Hammer · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 1:25 am

I don't think the graphics OWN SO BAD but I don't think they're crappy either, when I compare them to UT. That's beside the point, anyway.

I'm not downloading it because I've no interest in more zombie-slaying, even if it is coop. If I want cooperative play, I'll fire up UT and play a team objective game. For those who are into zombie games, it looks like a good mod to watch. :sick: IMHO, though, naked zombies just shouldn't exist; anatomically correct or Barbie style, it's just too creepy either way. It's a lose-lose situation.

ry:

James · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 1:28 am

Bjossi wrote:

Quote:

James, I'm playing Doom 3 at Ultra 1024 x 768 with 16xAF and 8xAA, I get average 60 FPS which is the max FPS of the game, so don't tell me what good graphics are.

Maybe you think the screenshots look great because you aren't spoiled like me. After I got my new computer, it will be hard to impress me with graphics, especially outdated graphics like UE2.5 delivers.

James · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 11:56 am

the only thing that bugs me about KF 2.0 is the naked people running around...........

*shouts*

put on some clothes ya friggen hippies........

Bjossi · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 1:07 pm

James wrote:

Quote:

sure i dont have doom3 but dont be so simple minded. look what BW did with the shitty UE2.5. yet you support this mod but toss aside any other because you dont think the creators can pull it off.

i'll take graphics over game play any day[/quote]i am getting closer to a new computer so watch out :][/quote]

If it is a Mac, then I don't have to worry much.

James · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 10:57 pm

Bjossi wrote:

Quote:

James wrote:

Quote:

sure i dont have doom3 but dont be so simple minded. look what BW did with the shitty UE2.5. yet you support this mod but toss aside any other because you dont think the creators can pull it off.

i'll take graphics over game play any day

thats why Golden Eye remains the best shooter to me? (N64 lol)

what are you talking about? the only thing i will miss out on is a couple of game, the big ones will be ported to mac.+ the fact that macs run on intel processors now.

lol, my new comp will rock yours SO bad...........

Post edited by: James, at: 2006/05/15 23:58

Bjossi · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 11:31 pm

Intel, better than AMD...you gave me a good laugh there. :lol:

You need to face the fact that the Macs aren't made for gaming, my computer will most likely be much better only because of better compability, not neccesarily because of better hardware. :S

EDIT: I'm not familiar with the higher-end Macs but here is a benchmark of Doom 3 from March this year if you're interested.
http://www.macworld.com/news/2005/03/16/doom3/index.php

From what I can see, my computer is at least three times faster than these numbers. I get average 60 FPS on higher settings than even showed there.

I'm sorry man, but you should consider a PC if you are a gamer.

ry:

Post edited by: Bjossi, at: 2006/05/16 00:41

James · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 11:42 pm

Bjossi wrote:

Quote:

Intel, better than AMD...you gave me a good laugh there. :lol:

You need to face the fact that the Macs aren't made for gaming, my computer will most likely be much better only because of better compability, not neccesarily because of better hardware. :S

EDIT: I'm not familiar with the higher-end Macs but here is a benchmark of Doom 3 from March this year if you're interested.
http://www.macworld.com/news/2005/03/16/doom3/index.php

From what I can see, my computer is at least three times faster than these numbers. I get average 60 FPS on higher settings than even showed there.

I'm sorry man, but you should consider a PC if you are a gamer.

ry:

Post edited by: Bjossi, at: 2006/05/16 00:41

you dont get it.........

i dont want a mac just for gaming, i just like the mac interface more (pluss the lack of viruses lol)

simple as dat

Bjossi · **Posted:** Mon May 15, 2006 11:59 pm

I think you can download Windows styles that resemble the Mac GUI. And Windows is pretty virusproof if you get yourself one of the free virus protections.

James · **Posted:** Tue May 16, 2006 1:50 am

Bjossi wrote:

Quote:

I think you can download Windows styles that resemble the Mac GUI. And Windows is pretty virusproof if you get yourself one of the free virus protections.

true that is...........

like i said i dont want a computer just for gaming so i am not worried about having my settings maxed out on ut2014 lol

Bjossi · **Posted:** Tue May 16, 2006 11:14 am

I can understand your point, you get so used to the computers, it is nearly impossible to switch. I could never go from Windows to Mac myself...:S

James · **Posted:** Tue May 16, 2006 8:50 pm

Bjossi wrote:

Quote:

I can understand your point, you get so used to the computers, it is nearly impossible to switch. I could never go from Windows to Mac myself...:S

lol, so we have a understanding...........

ShadowBlade · **Posted:** Wed May 17, 2006 10:30 am

KF 2.0 looks better than the old one..

but still no crosshairs? wtf..

Various factors on these forums, have shown me that a Mac is not the way to go:dry: no offence.. mind you, it probably is kinda hard to switch platforms after years.. same like software really.. just gotta give em a try..

James · **Posted:** Wed May 17, 2006 11:04 am

ShadowBlade wrote:

Quote:

KF 2.0 looks better than the old one..

but still no crosshairs? wtf..

Various factors on these forums, have shown me that a Mac is not the way to go:dry: no offence.. mind you, it probably is kinda hard to switch platforms after years.. same like software really.. just gotta give em a try..

hell, i'll just buy both :woohoo:

Bjossi · **Posted:** Wed May 17, 2006 11:51 am

Isn't that a little out of the average Joe's price range? :S

James · **Posted:** Wed May 17, 2006 9:00 pm

Bjossi wrote:

Quote:

Isn't that a little out of the average Joe's price range? :S

Forum rules

Bjossi, check this out....

Who is online